EU vs. X: The Fight for Clear Rules in Social Media

What’s Wrong with Blue Checkmarks?

A blue checkmark was once a badge of verification—a symbol that an account was trustworthy, credible, or notable. But that changed when X allowed anyone to purchase a blue checkmark for $8 a month. Now, the lines between authenticity and imitation are blurred.

The EU is concerned this feature can amplify misinformation or enable identity fraud, as unverified accounts can easily impersonate public figures, organizations, or businesses. The question arises: should a platform prioritize monetization over credibility? For the EU, the answer is clear—public trust in digital platforms must outweigh profit.

The Issue with Ad Transparency

The Digital Services Act demands platforms provide full transparency of their advertising practices. Specifically, there must be an accessible ad database revealing details like who paid for an ad, who it targets, and how long it will be promoted.

Critics argue X is failing to meet these transparency goals. Researchers and watchdog organizations report difficulties in accessing this information, raising concerns about the misuse of ads to sway opinion or manipulate users. For platforms to ethically profit from advertising, users need clarity. No more hidden motives behind your next click.

The Critical Role of Researchers

Independent researchers are vital to monitoring large social media platforms, helping to hold them accountable for actions like content moderation and algorithmic biases. Yet, many complain that accessing valuable public data on platforms like X has become prohibitively complicated and expensive.

This becomes especially problematic when companies restrict data to the very entities meant to ensure their compliance with regulations. Under the DSA, transparency with researchers isn’t optional—platforms are legally bound to provide easier access to relevant datasets.

The EU’s ongoing investigation into X seeks to answer one key question: is the platform upholding these transparency standards, or is it engaging in systemic corporate opacity?

What If X Breaks the Rules?

Noncompliance with the DSA carries severe consequences. Companies could face fines reaching up to 6% of their global revenue—a staggering figure, particularly for global giants like X. While exact penalties remain to be seen, the message is clear: the EU is not afraid to enforce its vision of a safer digital landscape.

This probe into X, driven by its questionable ad practices and blue checkmark policy, could have ripple effects, influencing how other social media companies operate worldwide.

A Global Call for Accountability

Elon Musk’s platform isn’t alone under scrutiny. The EU is cracking down on other players, such as Meta, TikTok, and AliExpress, to enforce consistent standards across the tech industry. Policymakers hope these efforts will lead to a more transparent and safe online experience—not just in Europe, but globally.

By addressing issues like unchecked monetization, dark advertising, and limited researcher access, the EU is setting a global precedent for ethical tech practices.

What Do You Think?

Do you agree with the EU’s push for tighter regulation of platforms like X? Is this the best way to hold social media companies accountable, or is the EU overreaching? Let us know your thoughts in the comments!

Want to stay updated on how big tech and cybersecurity intersect? Visit [Yobitech’s Cybersecurity Blog](https://yobitech.io/cybersecurity-blog) for more in-depth insights. And don’t forget to share this post if you found it helpful!

---

Tags:

#Cybersecurity #DigitalServicesAct #BlueCheckmarkDebate #SocialMediaRegulation #TechTransparency #YobitechCybersecurity #OnlineSafety